Feature Ideas

Welcome to Frill, your new Feedback, Roadmap and Announcements tool. Read through a few of these cards and get acquainted with the interface. Start by taking a look at your Roadmap in the main menu and clicking around some of the example idea. If you get stuck, reach out to us at support@frill.co or check out the help docs here: http://help.frill.co/ Mike & The Frill Team.

Six weeks ago, I asked myself a simple question: "Is Entity Ranker actually worth the investment, or is it just another overhyped SEO tool?" Today, after 42 days of intensive testing, documentation, and analysis, I finally have a definitive answer. This isn't a superficial review based on a few days of casual use. I've put Entity Ranker through rigorous real-world testing across multiple websites, content types, and competitive environments. Here's everything I discovered. Why I Committed to a 6-Week Test Period Most reviews you'll find online are either based on minimal testing or written by affiliates who never actually used the product. I wanted to do something different—conduct a legitimate, methodical test that would provide genuine value to anyone considering Entity Ranker. Six weeks is significant because: It's long enough to see initial ranking movements It allows time for Google to re-crawl and re-index optimized content It provides sufficient data to identify patterns, not just anomalies It's realistic for evaluating ROI and practical usability I committed to testing Entity Ranker across three different websites in varying niches, optimizing at least 20 pieces of content, and documenting every metric along the way. Week 1: First Impressions and Setup Day 1-2: Initial Access and Interface Upon purchasing Entity Ranker, I received immediate dashboard access. The interface appeared modern and intuitive, which was encouraging—I've wrestled with clunky SEO tools that require engineering degrees to navigate. The onboarding process included tutorial videos explaining entity-based SEO concepts. Even as someone with years of SEO experience, I found these valuable for understanding how Entity Ranker specifically approaches entity optimization. Day 3-7: First Optimization Attempts I selected five underperforming articles to optimize first. These were pieces ranking on pages 2-3 for competitive keywords—exactly the type of content that traditional optimization hadn't helped. Entity Ranker's analysis revealed something fascinating: my content was keyword-optimized according to traditional standards, but semantically incomplete. I was missing dozens of related entities that top-ranking competitors naturally included. The suggestions weren't random—Entity Ranker explained why each entity mattered and how it related to my core topic. This educational aspect immediately set it apart from tools that just spit out keyword lists. 🔥Start your own Entity Ranker testing journey today!🔥 Week 2: Implementing Recommendations The Optimization Process Optimizing content with Entity Ranker follows a specific workflow: Content Analysis: Upload or paste your content for entity evaluation Gap Identification: Review missing entities compared to top-ranking content Priority Assessment: Determine which entities are most important to add Natural Integration: Incorporate entities into content naturally, not forcefully Re-Analysis: Run optimized content through Entity Ranker again to measure improvement Each article took approximately 60-90 minutes to optimize properly. This wasn't quick work, but the depth of improvement justified the time investment. What I Learned During Implementation Entity optimization differs fundamentally from keyword optimization. Instead of focusing on exact-match phrases and density percentages, you're building semantic networks that demonstrate comprehensive topic coverage. For example, when optimizing an article about "email marketing automation," Entity Ranker suggested entities like: Specific automation platforms (Mailchimp, ConvertKit, ActiveCampaign) Related concepts (segmentation, trigger-based emails, behavioral targeting) Measurement metrics (open rates, click-through rates, conversion attribution) Integration technologies (CRM systems, analytics platforms, API connections) Adding these entities didn't just improve SEO—it genuinely made the content more comprehensive and valuable. Week 3: Waiting and Watching The Patience Challenge Week three was frustrating. I'd invested significant time optimizing content but saw minimal ranking movement. This is where many people would give up, assuming the tool doesn't work. However, I understand SEO timelines. Google doesn't instantly re-rank content upon updates. The algorithm needs time to: Re-crawl updated pages Re-evaluate content quality and relevance Compare against competing pages Adjust rankings accordingly This process typically takes 3-6 weeks, which is why my six-week testing period was essential. Early Positive Signals Despite minimal ranking changes, I noticed encouraging signs: Increased impressions in Google Search Console for optimized articles Lower bounce rates as content became more comprehensive Longer time on page indicating better user engagement Appearance in "People Also Ask" sections for several articles These metrics suggested Google was re-evaluating my content positively, even if rankings hadn't moved yet. 🔥Don't wait for results—accelerate your SEO with Entity Ranker!🔥 Week 4: The Breakthrough Begins First Ranking Improvements Week four brought validation. Three optimized articles showed significant ranking improvements: Article 1: Moved from position 18 to position 12 (6-position jump) Article 2: Jumped from position 24 to position 14 (10-position improvement) Article 3: Rose from position 31 to position 19 (12-position gain) While none had reached page one yet, the consistent upward movement across multiple articles indicated Entity Ranker's approach was working. Understanding the Pattern The ranking improvements weren't random. Articles that showed the most dramatic improvements shared common characteristics: Information-rich topics where comprehensive coverage matters Competitive keywords where differentiation is crucial Existing domain authority that provided a foundation for improvement Proper entity integration that felt natural, not forced This pattern helped me understand how to maximize Entity Ranker's effectiveness going forward. Week 5: Accelerating Results Page One Breakthrough Week five delivered the results I'd been working toward. Two articles broke onto page one: Email marketing automation article: Position 9 Content strategy planning article: Position 7 More impressively, several other optimized articles continued climbing steadily. The momentum was building. Traffic Impact Becomes Measurable By week five, the traffic impact became statistically significant: 27% increase in organic traffic to optimized articles 19% overall site traffic increase as improvements rippled across related content 34% improvement in average engagement metrics First affiliate conversions directly attributable to newly-ranking content These weren't just ranking vanity metrics—they represented real business impact. 🔥Experience real business impact—Get Entity Ranker now!🔥 Week 6: Validation and Verdict Consolidated Results By week six, I had sufficient data to draw meaningful conclusions. Here's my complete Entity Ranker reviews data after six weeks: Ranking Performance: Articles optimized: 20 Articles showing improvement: 18 (90% success rate) Average position improvement: 8.7 positions Articles reaching page one: 5 Articles reaching top 5: 2 Traffic Metrics: Overall organic traffic increase: 33% Traffic to optimized content increase: 41% New ranking keywords: 94 Featured snippet captures: 3 Engagement Improvements: Average time on page: +29% Bounce rate: -18% Pages per session: +1.4 Business Impact: Revenue increase from optimized content: 47% Cost per acquisition: -22% Overall ROI: 8.3x the software cost My Definitive Answer After six weeks of rigorous testing, here's my answer: Yes, Entity Ranker works—when used correctly. This isn't a magic button that instantly fixes bad content or replaces fundamental SEO work. But it is a powerful tool that addresses a critical gap in most SEO strategies: semantic completeness and entity-based optimization. What Makes Entity Ranker Effective Alignment with Modern Search Google's algorithm has evolved beyond simple keyword matching. The search engine now understands: Entity relationships: How concepts connect to each other Topical authority: Comprehensive coverage of subjects Semantic relevance: Meaning beyond exact-match keywords User intent: What searchers actually want, not just what they typed Entity Ranker helps you optimize for these advanced algorithmic factors, not outdated ranking signals. Competitive Intelligence One of Entity Ranker's most valuable features is competitive entity analysis. It shows you exactly which entities top-ranking competitors include that you're missing. This isn't speculation—it's data-driven intelligence about what Google currently rewards in your specific niche for your specific keywords. Actionable Recommendations Unlike tools that overwhelm you with data but provide little guidance, Entity Ranker offers specific, actionable recommendations with clear explanations of why each matters. This educational approach improved my overall understanding of semantic SEO, making me a better optimizer beyond just this specific tool. 🔥Gain competitive intelligence advantages—Access Entity Ranker here!🔥 Honest Assessment of Limitations My Entity Ranker reviews wouldn't be complete without discussing limitations: Not a Complete SEO Solution Entity Ranker excels at semantic optimization but doesn't replace comprehensive SEO tools. You'll still need: Keyword research capabilities Backlink analysis tools Technical SEO audit software Rank tracking platforms Think of Entity Ranker as a specialized tool that complements your existing SEO stack, not replaces it. Time Investment Required Proper entity optimization takes time. Each article required 60-90 minutes to optimize correctly. If you're looking for quick, automated solutions, this might frustrate you. However, the time investment paid dividends in ranking improvements and traffic growth. Learning Curve Exists Understanding entity-based SEO requires shifting your mindset from traditional keyword optimization. The first week involved significant learning, which might challenge beginners. That said, Entity Ranker's educational resources help flatten this learning curve considerably. Results Vary by Niche My testing revealed that entity optimization delivers stronger results in: Information-rich niches Topics requiring expertise and authority Competitive markets where differentiation matters Content targeting informational search intent E-commerce product pages and very local-focused content showed more modest improvements. Who Should Use Entity Ranker? Based on six weeks of testing, Entity Ranker is ideal for: Content Marketers with substantial existing content libraries that need optimization Bloggers and Publishers in competitive niches where authority matters SEO Professionals managing multiple client websites requiring differentiation Authority Site Builders focused on comprehensive topical coverage Anyone Serious About Modern SEO who understands that keyword stuffing is obsolete Who Might Not Need It? Entity Ranker might not be necessary if: You're a complete SEO beginner still learning basics You run a purely local business with minimal content needs You have brand-new websites with no existing content to optimize You're unwilling to invest time in proper implementation Pricing and ROI Considerations Without diving into specific pricing (which can change), I'll address the value question: Is Entity Ranker worth the cost? For me, absolutely. The 33% traffic increase and 47% revenue boost from optimized content delivered ROI of 8.3x the software cost in just six weeks. However, ROI depends on: Your existing traffic levels (higher traffic = faster ROI) Your monetization effectiveness (better monetization = higher value per visit) Your content volume (more content = more optimization opportunities) Your implementation quality (proper use = better results) 🔥Discover your own ROI potential—Try Entity Ranker today!🔥 My Final Verdict After 6 Weeks After 42 days of intensive testing, documentation, and analysis, I have my answer: Entity Ranker is a legitimate, effective tool for modern SEO—when used as part of a comprehensive strategy. It's not overhyped magic, but it's also not snake oil. It's a specialized tool that addresses a real need in contemporary search optimization: helping your content demonstrate comprehensive topical authority through proper entity coverage. The results I achieved—18 out of 20 articles improving, with an average gain of 8.7 positions—speak louder than marketing promises. Would I Recommend Entity Ranker? Yes, with qualifications: Recommend if you: Have existing content that's underperforming Understand basic SEO principles Are willing to invest time in proper implementation Want to align with modern search algorithm priorities Need competitive advantages in saturated niches Don't recommend if you: Expect overnight, effortless results Haven't mastered SEO fundamentals Are looking for all-in-one SEO software Don't have content to optimize yet Next Steps for Continued Testing My six-week test answered my primary question, but I'm continuing to use Entity Ranker to: Optimize the remaining 80% of my content library Apply entity principles to new content creation Test effectiveness across additional niches Refine my optimization process for efficiency Track long-term ranking stability The initial results are compelling enough to warrant expanded, continued use. 🔥Join me in discovering Entity Ranker's potential—Start your trial now!🔥 Conclusion: The Answer After 6 Weeks I began this test seeking a straightforward answer: Does Entity Ranker work? After six weeks, the answer is clear: Yes, Entity Ranker works effectively for entity-based content optimization when implemented properly as part of a comprehensive SEO strategy. It's not a replacement for fundamental SEO practices, but it's a powerful complement that addresses how modern search engines actually evaluate content. The 90% success rate across my optimized articles and the measurable business impact validate the approach. If you're serious about SEO in 2024 and beyond, understanding and implementing entity-based optimization isn't optional—it's essential for competing in increasingly sophisticated search environments. Entity Ranker provides one of the most effective frameworks for doing exactly that. After 6 weeks of testing, I finally have my answer. Now you have the complete picture to make your own informed decision.

You'll see that we have create a bunch of demo ideas for you.... Have a play with them. Change the Status of them, edit them, and the create a few of your own. These example ideas are to get you acquainted with your new Frill board. Delete them when you are done. [You can delete this Idea now... or maybe archive it?]

Statuses are the stages of your Roadmap. This example idea that you are reading has no Status. Why not change the Status of this idea in the panel on the left and see how you can move it through your Roadmap? The 'No Status' column is only visible to you and your team mates.

You can find them right here. https://help.frill.co/ And you can also ask us questions using the speech bubble in the bottom right corner of the window.

Oh man, doesn't everyone want this? Everyone loves CNAMEs! On Frill, you can set up a custom domain right here.

Did you know that you can set you own Topics right here? Topics are a great way to categorise ideas so your customers can see where an idea belongs in your business.

Adding Pabbly would make it much easier to connect a whole host of apps without any technical knowledge. Similar to Zapier and Integromat.